Almost 1/3 of Americans Own an E-Reader or a Tablet

According to new research released by the good people at The Pew Internet Project,  "the share of adults in the United States who own tablet computers nearly doubled from 10% to 19% between mid-December and early January and the same surge in growth also applied to e-book readers, which also jumped from 10% to 19% over the same time period." This brings the total number of Americans who own at least one tablet or e-reader to 29%.

This study puts solid numbers on the tablet and e-reader market growth speculations. It is becoming more and more important for organizations to look into how they are going to integrate tablet and, more broadly,  mobile security into their enterprise DLP strategy. 

Two of the largest enterprise DLP vendors,Symantec and Websense, are introducing a DLP plug-in for tablets this year. The concept for tablets is pretty basic and shared for the most part across vendors. It works like an endpoint monitor that views and classifies information as it flows from a tablet to a web or cloud application. If the content is deemed appropriate it is allowed to reach its destination, and if the content is sensitive it will either notify DLP administrators, block the content or a combination of both.

Cyber Monday Means Loss of Productivity

As Black Friday has come and gone many consumers are excited for Cyber Monday. The only problem? Many Americans who plan to partake in the deals offered online are doing so at work. According to a recent survey done by the staffing firm Adecco,nearly half of American workers (46 percent) plan to make a dent in their holiday shopping during work hours – either through online shopping while at work, shopping on lunch breaks, taking sick days or cutting out a little early periodically. Another similar survey done by Randstad shows that 40% of employees plan to only spend an hour online shopping at work while 1 in 3 plan to spend over 5 hours of their work day shopping online.


The lure of online deals does not only pose a threat to productivity, but it can also expose the corporate network to malware. Malware and spam attacks are often quickly formulated and executed based on current events and popular online happenings. These malicious websites are found as links that are a part of common searches such as "Cyber Monday Deals". 


Since many people will be ordering online the use of online postal tracking will go up as well, because of this hackers will be sending postage and shipping related emails to trick people into downloading malicious attachments. Websense Security Labs cites this type of spam as one of the "Top 5 Malicious Spam Subjects" .


Security Labs has detailed the type of subjects and email contents everyone should be on the lookout for.

• USPS Invoice copy ID46298 (numbers vary)
• FedEx: New Agent File Form, trackid: 1V6ZFZ7FEOHUQ (numbers vary)
• DHL Express Notification for shipment 90176712199 (numbers vary)

The email will look like this:

The moral of the story is to shop at home, be careful, and no matter how good the deal looks, do not suspend judgement to click on a strange looking link. Also remember that shipping companies will never require you to download an email attachment to get information about your packages and if you are still concerned, check their website for accurate and up to date information.

Mansfield, Ohio -- Area Agency on Aging: Breached due to Lost Laptop

On June 3, an employee of the Area Agency of Agency in Mansfield, Ohio had a laptop stolen from their car. This resulted in the exposure of personal data related to 43,000 customers.  The laptop was assigned to a Passport case manager. The personal data was health related in nature and also contained the  personal contact information of 35,000 related clients' personal representatives.  


According to a report in The Morning Journal  the Area Agency on Aging had the following response to the Breach:

“The Area Agency on Aging understands the importance of safeguarding our consumer’s personal information and takes that responsibility very seriously,” said Duana Patton, chief executive officer. “We deeply regret that this incident occurred, and we have already taken steps to ensure our laptops are properly equipped to secure personal information from unauthorized access in the future.” 

Unfortunately many organizations take a reactive approach to encrypting endpoint devices such as laptops and cell phones that may contain sensitive information. 


Oil giant BP, had a similar incident this spring in which an employee lost their laptop during routine business travel. The laptop contained  unencrypted personal data such as names, social security numbers, and dates of birth for over 13,000 people who submitted claims with the company after last years oil spill. 


According to Ponemon's "Cost of a Lost Laptop" report, a lost or stolen, unencrypted laptop, will cost an organization $20,000 more than if an encrypted laptop is lost or stolen. Read the full Ponemon report here: Cost of a Lost Laptop Study - Ponemon

77% Of Business Experienced Data Loss Last Year

A survey of over 2,400 IT security administrators conducted by Check Point and Ponemon reveals 77% of businesses experienced data loss last year. This number does not correlate with the number of reported breaches, but with increasing stringency of compliance regulations, we may begin to see more and more reported breaches.

The study’s research shows organizations are struggling with the growing set of security priorities and limited employee awareness about corporate security policies. Over 55 percent of companies surveyed are using more than seven vendors to perform security tasks. Because of this, organizations struggle with minimizing TCO and maximizing performance.

Approaching security with a holistic view of an organization’s technology is the first step in enforcing better protection. This helps to determine where risks can reside. Security is more than a simple technology solution. Aligning IT security with business needs requires a combination of policies, people and enforcement.

Epsilon Breach Estimated to Cost $4B

The highly publicized data breach of email service provider Epsilon could cost the organization upwards of four billion dollars. This estimate comes from a report done by cyber risk advisory firm CyberFactors, and is dependent on what is done with the data.

               

According to CSO.com

"That figure [$4 billion] could be reached if criminals get hold of the email addresses and successfully exploit them to gather more personal information and carry out a spear-phishing blitz, according to the report. 'However, until such an event takes place and can be directly linked back to this specific breach, the estimate remains theoretical, but certainly possible given the multitude of sites that use email addresses as user IDs,' the report says."

The report goes on further to estimate that the Costs to Epsilon's customers could be $5.5 million each for notification of their customers about the theft, settlements to those customers, legal defense, compliance adjustments and loss of business.

In contrast to this report CEO of Alliance Data Systems, Epsilon's parent company, Ed Heffernan says he sees no meaningful cost or liability stemming from the incident and that they will not see the customer churn that often follows a breach. 

Although Heffernan believes he will not see significant costs as a result of the breach, the widely known act could hold weighty impacts to Epsilon and even Alliance Data’s brand. If Epsilon is lucky, the company has the potential to escape any non-compliance fines, but this does not mean they will be free of detrimental brand impact. Brand losses are approximately 49% of the cost of a data breach and Heffernan may not be taking this into account when he states that the cost will not be meaningful.

If you were a company who needed third party email services, would you want to do business with a company that had more than a million customer records at risk? Probably not.  A tactical data loss prevention strategy may have saved this company, and those customers affected by the breach the trouble this breach has presented.

2011 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report

Verizon recently released their Data Breach Investigations Report.  The report covers approximately 800 data breach cases from 2010.  The review of breaches covers threat agents and actions, how breaches typically occur, and provides statistics on breached organizations.

Below you will find a summary of organizations who have reported breaches in the past year by size. It may be surprising to find that organizations with 11 to 100 employees have reported 436 breaches.

1 to 10	46
11 to 100	436
101 to 1,000	74
1,001 to 10,000	49
10,001 to 100,000	59
Over 100,000	55
Unknown	40

This may not be surprising to you, but the report concludes that 97 percent of the breaches could have been avoided by using simple controls. Do you have the simple controls in place to protect your organization's data? According to the study, organizations should focus mitigation efforts in the following areas:

88% of Breaches Involve Insider Negligence

Malicious acts only account for 12% of reported breaches. Preventing the negligent acts, which are the cause of a breach 88% of the time, is much easier than trying to stop someone who is actively attempting to steal data. By creating an risk strategy and putting DLP policies and an Enterprise DLP (eDLP) technology into place, an organization can protect itself from negligent data loss.

Someone maliciously trying to steal data has a high likelihood of success. If organizations can effectively stop the easy stuff, the negligent leaks, they will achieve a much higher risk reduction than if their focus is simply to stop malicious acts. 

Hot Topic: Smartphone Security

Cell phones have come a long way, from the Gordon Geckko 80's brick phone to today’s smartphones which are essentially pocket-sized computers.  Cell phones are no longer "just" a phone, they help us organize our lives, stay in touch via social networking, waste time. As more and more people adopt "smartphones" it is becoming an enticing frontier for hackers everywhere. Smartphone security is going beyond protecting against physical loss.  Many organizations that have employees who use smartphones to store company data often overlook simple security measures that are standard for any laptop or any other device with access to the internet.  

There are many companies that see this space for what it is, a relatively un-penetrated market with room for growth. Virtualization giant VMWare has partnered with smartphone manufacturer LG and they have begun building a smartphone with two virtualized machines, one for work and one for personal usage. These machines would be completely isolated from one another and allow an organization to support, distribute, and secure one type of smartphone while allowing employees to use the phone for personal use as well without risking exposing company data. Internet security firm Check Point Software found in a global survey that 64% of organizations are concerned that the growth in remote users will result in exposure to sensitive data and as a result are looking to encrypt and protect mobile devices. Smartphone manufacturers have also begun building proprietary encryption for their phones, or partnering with encryption companies. The gold standard for secure, encrypted smartphones is Blackberry which has been deemed secure for use in some of the highest levels of government.

Moral of the story is, protect yourself against these developing threats by installing anti-malware software on your smartphone and beware inherent threats when downloading mobile apps and clicking on mysterious links on social networking sites. Treat your cell phone like you treat your laptop, after all, the delineation between these devices is getting fuzzier and fuzzier.

Bank of America Breached: Employees Take Customer Data

According to papers filed last week at the New York Supreme Court, four former Bank of America employees left the organization for another wealth management firm, and brought an unnamed number of customer databases with them.

The employees felt that they were entitled to the information in the databases based on a contact sharing protocol that many banks agree to during job negotiations. Bank of America denies agreeing to this protocol.

Further hearings on this case will take place in January. This case comes as Bank of America is rumored to be preparing for the posting of damaging leaked documents pertaining to the mortgage crisis, by the website WikiLeaks.

New York-Presbyterian Hospital & Columbia University Medical Center — 6,800 Records

Sometime in July, 2010 paitent information, including names, clinical data, and in a few cases social security numbers, was made available to the public via the internet. The exposure was discovered by a paitent’s family member on July 29, 2010.

The cause of the breach has been determined to have been caused by paitent data being inadvertently placed on a server that was accessible from outside.

Read more about this story here: http://www.phiprivacy.net/?tag=newyork-presbyterian